Immigration into Britain is out of control. The following policy is an outline of our general intent and approach. It is grounded in the belief that a nation does not owe the world unfettered access through its borders or entitlement to its welfare systems. The state’s primary obligation is to its own people, ensuring their well-being, security, and preserving genuine national unity.

However, we recognise that mass, uncontrolled immigration is not an isolated issue. It is a symptom of a collapsing administrative state and a political system that has strayed from the principles of natural law, weakening the bond between nation and state. Though we set out our thinking on proper administration below, to fully address the problem, we believe the state must be rebuilt from the ground up and rooted in our best traditions and history.

We believe that immigration control must be built into every aspect of policy from education, health, and policing to trade, foreign policy, and taxation. Control will only be possible when the apparatus of state is reformed to be accountable and run in the service of our people.

Defining and protecting national borders and identity is not merely an administrative duty; it is deeply connected to the natural human desire for political sovereignty and self-determination. This desire is especially strong among those who share a common heritage, cultural traditions, and a homeland. Therefore, policy must prioritise the protection of these elements to maintain social harmony and the unity of our people.

We believe our approach is the most serious and sensible of any political party in the UK. Rather than wasting time with superficial “net zero” promises, we directly confront the real issues of demographic replacement, overpopulation, cultural degradation, and crime directly. What we propose is a radical but necessary overhaul of the entire system.

Our policy is divided into three parts: Ongoing Campaigns, Immigration, and Remigration. The Immigration and Remigration sections contain sub-sections. Click on each heading to expand and explore these sections further. Sources for facts and figures are provided in the endnotes, which may be amended over time.

1. Ongoing Campaigns

Localised Opposition

We strongly oppose the use of hotels, military bases, HMOs, and other council accommodations to house migrants. The priority must be to house our own people first, not individuals from around the world. It is a grave misuse of taxpayer money to allocate resources to this cause while many of our citizens face homelessness and hardship. Diverting funds to support incomers while our own people suffer on the streets is not only unjust but deeply irresponsible. Every Homeland Party councillor is committed to ending this practice.

Where planning permission is sought for migrant accommodation, we will vigorously oppose it. We will lead local campaigns against such developments, working directly with communities to prevent them. A prime example of our success was the sustained campaign in Erskine, where we helped residents keep a migrant hotel at a fraction of its capacity until it was ultimately closed.

These efforts are far more effective when we work closely with local communities and when councillors are actively involved in the opposition. Focusing our efforts on areas where we already have support, rather than spreading ourselves too thin, is key to success. Consistent pressure in a local area is the most effective way to gradually grind the liberal establishment down. All of our people should aim to join their local councils—not only to tackle this issue but to address many others that affect the well-being of our communities.

Immigration Referendum

We call for a binding referendum on mass migration, as polling has consistently demonstrated that the public does not support large-scale immigration. For too long, the state has blatantly disregarded the clear wishes of the people. We believe that a campaign for an immigration referendum is not only necessary but achievable, even before assuming governmental power, and that the people’s voice should directly influence immigration policy. To learn more about this idea, please visit our page Immigration Referendum Explained.

2. Immigration

3. Remigration!

Remigration involves systematically reversing laws and policies that permit and encourage mass immigration while implementing new laws and policies to facilitate and encourage mass emigration. It prioritises the removal of criminals who harm society, creates safe voluntary routes for others to emigrate, and is guided by clear criteria such as criminality, political extremism, and cultural alignment.

Remigration simply refers to a comprehensive emigration policy, introduced by democratic means, and is as normal as any other, such as the recruitment of guest workers or provision of temporary refuge. By contrast, the decades-long “replacement migration” experiment,(2) imposed particularly across Europe and the UK, was initiated without public consent and is far from normal.

Political opposition often distorts remigration by equating it with horror scenarios. In reality, open and honest discussion shows that remigration of illegal, unintegrated, and unwelcome migrants is legally viable, morally justifiable, practically feasible, and benefits society as a whole.

Over the next decade, “remigration” will become as essential a concept as “identity” and “freedom.”

We believe these changes are not only right and proper but also fully in line with our nation’s long-standing traditions of fairness and equality before the law. Where migrants come seeking state handouts, leniency from the law, and other privileges, removing these incentives would prompt them to leave. As this is not their homeland, they feel no deep loyalty to it, and after all, they do have their own to return to. Why stay when it is no longer easy to take advantage of the system?

By restoring equal treatment under the law and eliminating these unwarranted benefits, we can create a more just society that upholds the rule of law. It is not only possible but highly probable that millions would choose to leave under such circumstances.

Endnotes

  1. The Gov.uk website details 29 types of work visa, including specifics for Indian and Turkish nationals. ↩︎
  2. With reference to “Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?” (2001), United Nations Secretariat, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. ↩︎
  3. A report from the House of Lords Library showed by 31st December 2023, there were 10,423 foreign nationals in prison. This was 12% of the total prison population of 87,489. A Statement in Hansard on 25th April 2024 references an additional 12,000 such individuals living in the community who should have been removed. ↩︎
  4. We have been unable to produce an estimate for this figure due to the failure of the Home Office and the Office for National Statistics to either collect or publish the data we need. We would expect the number to be at least in the tens of thousands but could potentially be in the hundreds of thousands. ↩︎
  5. A Home Office policy paper, “Nationality and Borders Bill: Deprivation of citizenship factsheet”, last updated on 13th October 2023, provides a figure from the most recent available dataset covering the period from 2010 to 2018. ↩︎
  6. The Telegraph, 7th October 2024. ↩︎
  7. Pew Research Centre Report 13th November 2019. ↩︎
  8. David Palmer and Alasdair Wood, “The politics of fantasy”. Civitas, June 2017.. ↩︎
  9. The Gov.uk website details the current ‘voluntary return’ programme. ↩︎
  10. With reference to Home Office Guidance “Countries defined as developing by the OECD” 26 April 2021. ↩︎
Scroll to Top